|
RESULTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITION - EPK DRAVA 2012
The Competition Jury’s sessions for the INTERNATIONAL, PUBLIC, ANONYMOUS, IDEAS, SINGLE-STAGE ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITION, took place at the premises of the Art Gallery Maribor, where the organizer delivered all the competition solutions and carried out the preliminary testing. We received 344 packages with 400 competition entries for all three groups.
Competition Group 1 and Group2:
The Competition technical committee received 59 entries for the Group 1/Embankment and 124 entries for the Group2/Fotbridge. In the time period from 11th March 2010 (Thursday) to and including 13th March 2010 (Saturday), the Competition Jury for Competition Groups (Area) 1 and 2 met for 6 working sessions.
The Jury conducted its work after the preliminary testing had been done. It was assisted by the reporters, who provided information. The jury reviewed and evaluated the individual competition solutions at plenary sessions and in working groups. The evaluation jury members again reviewed the preliminarily written evaluations of the project proposals included in the last round of voting. After receiving confirmation of these evaluations, the trustee handed the sealed envelopes containing the authorship details for both competition groups to the president of the evaluation jury. After opening the envelopes, the evaluation jury established the identity of the authors or groups of authors.
Competition Group 3:
The Competition technical committee received 217 entries for the Group 3/Gallery. In the time period from 18th March 2010 (Thursday) to and including 20th March 2010 (Saturday) the Competition Jury for Competition Group (Area) 3 met for 5 working sessions.
All the Competition Jury’s sessions took place at the premises of the Art Gallery Maribor, where the organizer delivered all the competition solutions and carried out the preliminary testing.
The evaluation jury conducted its work after the preliminary testing had been done. Assisted by the reporters, who provided information, it reviewed and evaluated the individual competition solutions. The jury members prepared written final evaluations of each of the solutions receiving prizes and honourable mentions.
After opening the sealed envelopes (which had been in the trustee’s keeping until this point), the evaluation jury established the identity of the authors or groups of authors.
Please see the Final report of the jury for further details.
|
